No word yet from the Royal family.
“The first emergency measures include the restriction of the freedom of movement and the ban on individual traffic. Offenders can expect immediate admission to one of the central health camps.”
“Zu den ersten Notfallmaßnahmen gehören die Einschränkung der Bewegungsfreiheit und das Individualverkehrsverbot. Straftäter können mit der sofortigen Aufnahme in eines der zentralen Gesundheitslager rechnen.”
“Прве ванредне мере укључују ограничавање слободе кретања и забрану индивидуалног саобраћаја. Преступници могу да очекују моментални пријем у један од централних здравствених кампова.”
The Hamburg Syndrome is a 1979 West German-French science fiction film directed by Peter Fleischmann and starring Helmut Griem, Fernando Arrabal and Carline Seiser. The film is about an outbreak of an epidemic and quarantine. Wikipedia
What happens when the
protectors become the Predators?
NAZI FIREARMS LAW AND THE DISARMING OF THE GERMAN JEWS
17 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, No. 3, 483-535 (2000)
Stephen P. Halbrook*
We are in danger of forgetting that the Bill of Rights reflects
experience with police excesses. It is not only under Nazi rule that
police excesses are inimical to freedom. It is easy to make light of
insistence on scrupulous regard for the safeguards of civil liberties
when invoked on behalf of the unworthy. It is too easy. History
bears testimony that by such disregard are the rights of liberty
extinguished, heedlessly at first, then stealthily, and brazenly in the
Justice Felix Frankfurter1
The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow
the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all
conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms
have prepared their own downfall by so doing.
Nary a peep from the Queen. Could it be the royal family supports the subjugation of their subjects?
In 2007 the state of Kano sued Pfizer for US $2.75 billion, while the Nigerian federal government sued for US $8.5 billion in damages, alleging that the pharmaceutical giant “pretended it came [to Nigeria] to render humanitarian service” but in actuality, “Pfizer devised a scheme under which it misrepresented and failed to disclose its primary motive in seeking to participate in giving care to the victims of the epidemic.” Nigeria even sought criminal charges against Pfizer officials, including the CEO at the time of the experiment, William Steer.
The terrorist-finance mechanism was straightforward: the terrorists
openly controlled the Iraqi ministry in charge of importing medical goods, and Defendants – all
of which are large Western medical-supply companies – obtained lucrative contracts from that
ministry by making corrupt payments to the terrorists who ran it. Those payments aided and
abetted terrorism in Iraq by directly financing an Iran-backed, Hezbollah-trained militia that
killed or injured thousands of Americans.
Pfizer was sued in a U.S. federal court for using Nigerian children as human guinea pigs, without the childrens’ parents’ consent. Pfizer paid $75 Million to settle in Nigerian court for using an experimental antibiotic, Trovan, on the children. The company paid an additional undisclosed amount in the U.S. to settle charges here. Pfizer had violated international law, including the Nuremberg Convention established after WWII, due to Nazi experiments on unwilling prisoners.
“This matter is one of National Security that warrants the court;’s immediate attention…”